Technology Feasibility Assessment
Includes
- Business objective assessment
- Build vs buy recommendation
- MVP recommendation
- Major risks
- Preliminary technology direction
- Expected investment range
From idea validation and specifications to vendor selection, project governance and final acceptance, Pannu Advisory helps you make better technology decisions — without vendor bias.
We don't build software. We make sure it gets built right.
The buyer's side of the table
Business Idea
Your objective
Independent Advisory
Pannu Advisory
Development Vendor
Builds the software
Successful Outcome
Verified & accepted
The software development vendor sits on one side of the table. We sit on the other — with you. Our only interest is the quality of the decision you make.
No developers to sell.
No technology to push.
No hidden vendor commissions.
Independent advice based on your business requirements.
Vendor A quotes
$15,000
Vendor B quotes
$40,000
Vendor C quotes
$80,000
Who is right?
The answer cannot be determined until the requirement, architecture, performance expectations, security standards, scalability and acceptance criteria are properly defined. Pannu Advisory helps establish the benchmark before you commit.
Simple questions quickly expose the gap between a confident pitch and a genuinely defined project.
One vendor quotes $15,000. Another quotes $80,000. Which estimate is realistic?
Your vendor recommends Java. Is Java actually right for your project — or simply right for their team?
Your developer says the project is 80% complete. How is that percentage measured?
The proposal says the system will be “secure and scalable.” What does that actually mean?
The proposal says clicking a product opens the product page. How fast should it load — under what traffic, on which devices?
Your vendor requests a milestone payment. Has the milestone actually met the agreed acceptance criteria?
Pannu Advisory converts vague statements into measurable requirements, evaluation criteria and acceptance standards.
A proposal might say
“Clicking a product opens the product detail page.”
Pannu Advisory helps turn vague requirements into measurable standards before development begins.
A professional specification also defines
We represent your interests across the whole technology lifecycle, not just one decision in it.
You arrive with a problem to solve or a product to build.
We test whether — and how — software should be the answer.
We specify what is being built so it can be quoted and delivered.
We establish independently what the work should cost and take.
We run a structured selection to choose the right vendor.
We oversee delivery and verify progress against the plan.
We confirm the software is genuinely complete and ready to accept.
Should this software be built at all — and if so, what should it be? We pressure-test the idea before a rupee or dollar goes to development.
Explore this serviceTurn an idea into something vendors can accurately quote and objectively deliver. A vague brief is where budgets and timelines go to die.
Explore this serviceUnderstand what your software should realistically cost — before a vendor tells you. We benchmark effort, timeline and price independently.
Explore this serviceRun a structured, objective selection — from RFP to recommendation — so you choose the right vendor on the right terms, for the right reasons.
Explore this serviceIndependent, client-side oversight through delivery — so progress is verified, budgets hold, and problems surface early, not at go-live.
Explore this serviceFor projects that are late, over budget, or quietly off-track: an independent read of what is really complete, and what to do next.
Explore this serviceNot just meetings and opinions — tangible deliverables you can act on, share with your board, and hold a vendor to.
Includes
Includes
Includes
Includes
Includes
Includes
Three vendors can interpret the same requirement differently. Pannu Advisory standardizes the requirement, evaluates vendors against the same criteria and provides a documented recommendation.
| Criteria | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technical Approach | 8/10 | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Relevant Experience | 9/10 | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Team Capability | 8/10 | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Delivery Model | 7/10 | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Architecture | 8/10 | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Security | 8/10 | 9/10 | 6/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Commercial Fit | 9/10 | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Support & Handover | 8/10 | 9/10 | 6/10 |
| Risk | 8/10 | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Overall Score | 81/100 | 88/100 | 69/100 |
Recommendation: Vendor B — highest weighted score against standardized criteria.
Both have a role. Only one is structurally aligned with your outcome.
Your vendor builds the software. We protect the outcome. We have no development capacity to fill and no commercial incentive to increase your project scope — which is precisely what lets us advise you honestly.
Tell us your situation and we'll point you to the right first step — even if it's a small one.
You're here
We recommend
Software Strategy & Feasibility
You're here
We recommend
Independent Cost Estimation & Specification Review
You're here
We recommend
Vendor Selection
You're here
We recommend
Delivery Assurance
You're here
We recommend
Project Health Check
Fixed, focused engagements designed to answer one pressing question — often before a larger decision.
Find out how much of your software project is actually complete.
Check my projectPannu Advisory's perspective is informed by years of hands-on technology experience across complex software environments, regulated industries, enterprise platforms, public-sector systems, financial services, consumer businesses and large-scale digital initiatives.
Our understanding of software delivery comes from seeing projects from inside the technology industry — how requirements are interpreted, how estimates are created, how vendors staff projects, where scope gaps occur, why timelines slip and how technology decisions affect business outcomes.
That experience is now applied exclusively from the buyer's side.
Selected organizations represented in the technology experience behind Pannu Advisory
Selected organizations shown represent technology experience associated with BrancoSoft Technologies Private Limited and its teams. They should not be interpreted as current Pannu Advisory engagements unless explicitly stated.
The advice is grounded in real exposure to the kinds of systems where getting it wrong is expensive.
Systems where correctness, security and auditability are not optional.
Internal platforms that many roles depend on every day.
Structured, documented delivery under real governance.
Customer-facing products where experience and reliability meet.
If several of these sound familiar, an independent view is worth having sooner rather than later.
The vendor cannot clearly explain the estimate
Quotations vary dramatically
Scope is only a few pages
Acceptance criteria are missing
Technology selection is unexplained
Milestones are vague
Progress is only reported as percentages
Change requests are increasing rapidly
Deadlines keep moving
Architecture is undocumented
No independent QA process exists
Documentation is incomplete
Source-code / handover terms are unclear
Payment is requested before measurable acceptance
Vendor and client disagree about what was promised
Independence isn't a promise — it's a set of commitments we publish and hold ourselves to.
Whether your vendor is down the road or across the world, we represent your interests independently — verifying claims, validating milestones and keeping you informed across regions and time zones.
A disciplined, repeatable method that takes you from an idea to software you can confidently accept.
We start with your business, not the technology.
We test feasibility and direction before anyone commits.
We specify the work precisely enough to quote and deliver.
We run a fair, evidence-based vendor selection.
We provide independent oversight through delivery.
We confirm the software is genuinely ready to accept.
Independence isn't a slogan for us. It's built into how the firm makes money — and how it doesn't.
No stake in who builds it, or in how big the build becomes.
Recommendations grounded in analysis, not assertion.
Technology decisions judged by business value.
Clear reasoning you can follow and challenge.
We stand behind the advice we give.
Your project and information stay private.
The same brief can return a $10,000 quote and a $120,000 quote. Here is what that spread is actually telling you.
Vendors rarely make their proposals comparable. A disciplined buyer makes them comparable anyway.
The delivery model decides who carries the risk when reality diverges from the plan. Choose it deliberately.
A short, confidential conversation is often all it takes to change the trajectory of a technology investment.